for what happened. An interesting follow up post by Steven Berlin on the best way to gauge the tone in a room without technology is to crack a few jokes.
Reading the accounts you posted Roland makes me think less about mass collaboration, or collective intelligence . . . and more about mass pressurising.
Hard to imagine this could be a positive use of technology.
Hi Tessy,
Quite right and a good example of the dumbness of crowds: http://headrush.typepad.com/creating_passionate_users/2007/01/the_dumbness_of.html
I think the example at South by Southwest Interactive is not positive but there must be a good way by which technology can augment audience participation in a positive way, moving away from the teacher and pupil format of most events.
Bottom up systems still need structure and leadership else they usually decend into chaos, however it’s a different kind of structure and leadership to the one most of us are used to.
Reading the accounts you posted Roland makes me think less about mass collaboration, or collective intelligence . . . and more about mass pressurising.
Hard to imagine this could be a positive use of technology.
Hi Tessy,
Quite right and a good example of the dumbness of crowds:
http://headrush.typepad.com/creating_passionate_users/2007/01/the_dumbness_of.html
I think the example at South by Southwest Interactive is not positive but there must be a good way by which technology can augment audience participation in a positive way, moving away from the teacher and pupil format of most events.
Bottom up systems still need structure and leadership else they usually decend into chaos, however it’s a different kind of structure and leadership to the one most of us are used to.